Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2359 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 1037U - 274 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 16 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1037U | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |