In Rust, the Celeron 1037U is same performance as the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1037U
- Is 2 months and 28 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 2 months and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 1037U vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1037U vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1037U vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM3+ |
17W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
