In Rust, the Celeron 1037U is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 36% faster in Rust – 283 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 7 days newer – Jan 27, 2025 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 12 years and 7 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 1037U vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1037U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1037U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 27th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1851 |
17W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
