In Dead Space, the Celeron 1037U is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space – 183 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Celeron 1037U vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
101 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.89/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1037U vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1037U vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
