In Rust, the Celeron 1007U is slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 17 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 252 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$368
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
41%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
17W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
