In Control, the Celeron 1007U is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7435HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 17 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 7435HS
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 250 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | FP7 |
17W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
