In Deathloop, the Celeron 1007U is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 2600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
17W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
