In Rust, the Celeron 1007U is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 1600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 220 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 1600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 1600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Ryzen 5 1600 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $219.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
17W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
