In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron 1007U is quite a bit faster than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 214 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 17 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 69% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
