Celeron 1007U vs Core i9-13900K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Celeron 1007U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Average FPS
176
73%
Min 1% FPS
123
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241
100%
Min 1% FPS
163
100%
Price, $
$499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
