In Atomfall, the Celeron 1007U is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i7-620M
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
17W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
