In Control, the Celeron 1007U is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 17 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
Core i7-3770
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 246 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-3770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $278.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1155 |
17W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
