In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron 1007U is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 213 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
79%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
