In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Celeron 1007U is slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 113 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1007U vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
