Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4005 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 160% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 1000M - 558 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 28 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6519 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |