HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Atom Z3740 vs Core Ultra 9 285

The Atom Z3740 is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 670% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Available for $579

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

Atom Z3740

68FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

420FPS

Valorant2020

Atom Z3740

552FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

800FPS

Rust2018

Atom Z3740

264FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

361FPS

Overwatch 22023

Atom Z3740

570FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

574FPS

Dota 22013

171FPS

308FPS

204FPS

752FPS

Fortnite2017

Atom Z3740

360FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

320FPS

Apex Legends2019

Atom Z3740

414FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

391FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Atom Z3740

Core Ultra 9 285

73%

Core Ultra 9 285 ranks 71 points higher.

Coreshelp

Atom Z3740

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 20 more cores.

Threadshelp

Atom Z3740

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 20 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Atom Z3740

0 MB

Core Ultra 9 285

36 MB

Base Frequencyhelp

Atom Z3740

1.333 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

2.5 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 has a 88% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Atom Z3740

1.867 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

5.6 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 boosts 200% higher.

TDPhelp

Atom Z3740

Core Ultra 9 285

65W

Atom Z3740 draws 63W less power.

Pricehelp

Atom Z3740

Core Ultra 9 285

Atom Z3740Core Ultra 9 285

Intel BGA 1380

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Bay Trail-T

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

HD Graphics

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

1066 MHz (DDR3)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Atom Z3740 or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285. It's 3550% faster than the Atom Z3740 on average across 100+ games, scoring 73/100 vs 2/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285 than Atom Z3740?expand_more

3550% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Atom Z3740 or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 73/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Atom Z3740 and Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

Performance: Atom Z3740 scores 2/100, Core Ultra 9 285 scores 73/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Atom Z3740 or Core Ultra 9 285 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Atom Z3740 or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 73/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons