HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.29.11Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Atom x7425E vs Core Ultra 7 265F

The Atom x7425E is much slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

View All CPUs

Up to 553% cheaper – $58 vs $329.47
Up to 188% better value for money

CPU

$329.47View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 127% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Up to 553% more expensive – $329.47 vs $58

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

180FPS

406FPS

478FPS

740FPS

Dota 22013

Atom x7425E

178FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

298FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Atom x7425E

198FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

224FPS

Valorant2020

Atom x7425E

564FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

784FPS

Diablo IV2023

Atom x7425E

221FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

373FPS

Fortnite2017

Atom x7425E

324FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

323FPS

Overwatch 22023

Atom x7425E

516FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

571FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Atom x7425E

26%

Core Ultra 7 265F

69%

Core Ultra 7 265F ranks 43 points higher.

Coreshelp

Atom x7425E

Core Ultra 7 265F

Core Ultra 7 265F has 16 more cores.

Threadshelp

Atom x7425E

Core Ultra 7 265F

Core Ultra 7 265F has 16 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Atom x7425E

6 MB

Core Ultra 7 265F

30 MB

Core Ultra 7 265F has 24 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Atom x7425E

1.5 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F

2.4 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F has a 60% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Atom x7425E

3.4 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F

5.3 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F boosts 56% higher.

TDPhelp

Atom x7425E

12W

Core Ultra 7 265F

65W

Atom x7425E draws 53W less power.

Pricehelp

Atom x7425E

Core Ultra 7 265F

$329.47

Atom x7425ECore Ultra 7 265F

Intel BGA 1264

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Alder Lake-N

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

UHD Graphics 24EU

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Atom x7425E or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F. It's 165% faster than the Atom x7425E on average across 100+ games, scoring 69/100 vs 26/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265F than Atom x7425E?expand_more

165% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Atom x7425E or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265F worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 69/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

Performance: Atom x7425E scores 26/100, Core Ultra 7 265F scores 69/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Atom x7425E or Core Ultra 7 265F bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Atom x7425E or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is the stronger pick at 69/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.