In Atomfall, the Atom x7405C is slightly faster than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 197 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 12 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs FX-8320E: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
189 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
95%
Price, $
$144.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$57.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
12 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
