In Rocket League, the Atom x7405C is slightly faster than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Up to 1% faster in Rocket League – 971 vs 957 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rocket League
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 12 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rocket League FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
957 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
599 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$57.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
12W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
