In Rust, the Atom x7405C is slightly faster than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 214 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 12 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
FX-8300
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
91%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $57.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
12 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
