In Deathloop, the Atom x7405C is slightly slower than the FX-4350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 12 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
40%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $57.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
12 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
