In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Atom x7405C is slightly slower than the Core i5-3230M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 12 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 66% less energy
Core i5-3230M
- Up to 4% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 262 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs Core i5-3230M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
262 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
196 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs Core i5-3230M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs Core i5-3230M in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3230M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $57.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
12W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
