In Deathloop, the Atom x7405C is slightly slower than the Core i3-3110M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 12 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 66% less energy
Core i3-3110M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs Core i3-3110M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs Core i3-3110M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs Core i3-3110M in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $57.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
12 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
