In Rust, the Atom x7405C is slightly faster than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Atom x7405C
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 215 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 12 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 76% less energy
Celeron G3900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Atom x7405C vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
210 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
91%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Atom x7405C vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Atom x7405C vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Atom x7405C
Apr 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Atom x7405C Apr 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $57.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGA1151 |
12 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
