HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Atom x7213RE vs Core Ultra 9 285K

The Atom x7213RE is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 1302% cheaper – $42 vs $499.00
Up to 336% better value for money

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 222% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 7 months newer
Up to 1302% more expensive – $499.00 vs $42

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

Atom x7213RE

142FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

435FPS

Valorant2020

Atom x7213RE

543FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

818FPS

Rust2018

Atom x7213RE

273FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

366FPS

Overwatch 22023

Atom x7213RE

518FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

579FPS

Dota 22013

171FPS

320FPS

406FPS

765FPS

Fortnite2017

Atom x7213RE

325FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

316FPS

Apex Legends2019

Atom x7213RE

372FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

394FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Atom x7213RE

19%

Core Ultra 9 285K

76%

Core Ultra 9 285K ranks 57 points higher.

Coreshelp

Atom x7213RE

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 22 more cores.

Threadshelp

Atom x7213RE

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 22 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Atom x7213RE

6 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K has 30 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Atom x7213RE

2 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

3.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K has a 85% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Atom x7213RE

3.4 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

5.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 68% higher.

TDPhelp

Atom x7213RE

Core Ultra 9 285K

125W

Atom x7213RE draws 116W less power.

Pricehelp

Atom x7213RE

Core Ultra 9 285K

$499.00

Atom x7213RECore Ultra 9 285K

Intel BGA 1264

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Amston Lake

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

UHD Graphics 16EU

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Atom x7213RE or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 300% faster than the Atom x7213RE on average across 100+ games, scoring 76/100 vs 19/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Atom x7213RE?expand_more

300% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Atom x7213RE or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 76/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Atom x7213RE and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

Performance: Atom x7213RE scores 19/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 76/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Atom x7213RE or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Atom x7213RE or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 76/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons