Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Athlon II X2 240 vs EPYC 9335

The Athlon II X2 240 is slightly slower than the EPYC 9335 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

HowManyFPS Team · Prices updated · FPS from real gameplay sessions · Browse benchmarks

  • Up to 2% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 15 years and 5 months newer
  • Available for $3178

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

EPYC 9335 ranks 21 points higher.

Coreshelp

EPYC 9335 has 30 more cores.

Threadshelp

EPYC 9335 has 62 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp
AMD EPYC 9335 Logo
EPYC 9335
128 MB
Base Frequencyhelp

EPYC 9335 has a 7% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
AMD EPYC 9335 Logo
EPYC 9335
4.4 GHz
TDPhelp

Athlon II X2 240 draws 145W less power.

AM3
Sockethelp
SP5
Regor
Codenamehelp
Turin
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Server/Workstation
No Integrated Graphics
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics
DDR3
RAMhelp
6000 MHz (DDR5)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Athlon II X2 240 or EPYC 9335?expand_more
The EPYC 9335. It's 43% faster than the Athlon II X2 240 on average across 100+ games, scoring 70/100 vs 49/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is EPYC 9335 than Athlon II X2 240?expand_more
43% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Athlon II X2 240 or EPYC 9335?expand_more
The EPYC 9335 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the EPYC 9335 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 70/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Athlon II X2 240 and EPYC 9335?expand_more
Performance: Athlon II X2 240 scores 49/100, EPYC 9335 scores 70/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Athlon II X2 240 or EPYC 9335 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Athlon II X2 240 or EPYC 9335?expand_more
The EPYC 9335 is the stronger pick at 70/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games