Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Turion II Ultra M600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 40% better in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive than Turion II Ultra M600 - 426 vs 304 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Turion II Ultra M600 - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Turion II Ultra M600 - 8 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Turion II Ultra M600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Turion II Ultra M600 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Not Available | Collection | Core i7 |
| Caspian | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Not Available | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
| Segment | Mobile | |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 28 W |
| Not Available | Process Size | 10 nm |
| Not Available | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
