Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 31 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 44% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Turion 64 X2 TL-50 - 383 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 - 16 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Not Available | Collection | Core i7 |
| Taylor | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Not Available | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
| Segment | Mobile | |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
31 W | TDP | 45 W |
| Not Available | Process Size | 14 nm |
| Not Available | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
