Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 63 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900T - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 5% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX - 278 vs 266 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
266
95.68345323741008%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
1972
83.91489361702128%
Multi-Core
17651
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | vs | Intel Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
