Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 1014 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E-2276M - 198 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E |
Chagall | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |