Buy on Amazon
$90
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2399
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 2107 days newer than Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-6800K - 251 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Intel Boxed Core i7-6800K Processor (15M Cache, up to 3.60 GHz) FCLGA2011-3 (BX80671I76800K)
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Chagall | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
