Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i7-1068NG7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 950 days newer than Core i7-1068NG7.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-1068NG7 - 187 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 28 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Chagall | Codename | Ice Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
