Buy on Amazon
$1,499
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 269 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $899.0 vs $1499.0
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 165 vs 280 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77452 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10920X Desktop Processor 12 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
95.40298507462687%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
