Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 539 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 220 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $111.34 vs $1525.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
193
87.72727272727273%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1525
7%
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $111.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
75.53628480146052%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |