Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 7 days older than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 280 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1525
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1452
87.73413897280967%
Multi-Core
4669
32.025516153371285%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | No |