Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - 305 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $99.99 vs $925.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.36 vs $3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
305
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
11.881188118811883%
Price, $
$925
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $925 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3832 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
274
89.8360655737705%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |