Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 412 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E-2276M - 215 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |