Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i7-1068NG7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 348 days newer than Core i7-1068NG7.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-1068NG7 - 253 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 28 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ice Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
