Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 83 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 174 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
173
99.42528735632183%
Value, $/FPS
$16.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2775.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,775.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1558
92.95942720763723%
Multi-Core
13904
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |