Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 697 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 391 vs 385 FPS
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $49.99 vs $2775.95
- Up to 98% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $0.13 vs $7.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
385
98.46547314578005%
Value, $/FPS
$7.21/FPS
1.8030513176144247%
Price, $
$2775.95
1%
Buy for $2,775.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4021 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1558
97.19276356830942%
Multi-Core
13904
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |