Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 675 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 44% better in F1 23 than Celeron G4900 - 231 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $53.55 vs $3249.95
- Up to 98% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $0.33 vs $14.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.07/FPS
2%
Price, $
$3249.95
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,249.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8150 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |