Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 79 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 205 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 99% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $52.99 vs $4255.0
- Up to 99% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - $0.3 vs $20.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.76/FPS
1%
Price, $
$4255
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |