Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i7-10700F - 178 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $210.0 vs $1070.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $1.19 vs $6.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.01/FPS
19.800332778702163%
Price, $
$1070
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
177
99.43820224719101%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
96.70065986802639%
Multi-Core
7231
54.29901629496133%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |