Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-10500 - 154 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $140.0 vs $1234.02
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.92 vs $8.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.01/FPS
11%
Price, $
$1234.02
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,234.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |