Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 418 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 258 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $750.0 vs $1070.0
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75082 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
237
91.86046511627907%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$750
100%
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75083 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.4247150569886%
Multi-Core
7454
55.973567620334904%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Castle Peak | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |