Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 5 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Athlon 3000G - 427 vs 393 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $98.79 vs $1070.0
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.40851829634073%
Multi-Core
1975
14.83066756777052%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |