Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 626 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10400F - 184 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $109.63 vs $1700.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $0.62 vs $9.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.24/FPS
6%
Price, $
$1700
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |