Buy on Amazon
$129.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2347 days newer than Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i7-3770K - 201 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 77 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-3770K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155
Buy for $129.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
57.24696356275304%
Multi-Core
2469
33.33333333333333%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 77 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
