Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2315 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-3770 - 205 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $90.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.47 vs $5.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.24/FPS
8%
Price, $
$1075
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |