Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1488 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 486 vs 408 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $696.98 vs $1075.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.43 vs $2.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2650 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$696.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $696.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |